The Tier 1 EIS is following a process outlined by NEPA. It is designed to ensure that reasonable transportation alternatives are considered, that community input plays a key role, and that the environmental and community effects are fully disclosed.
The process includes:
A Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare a Tier 1 EIS was published in the Federal Register on May 20, 2016. A copy of the NOI is available on the Documents page. General information regarding the proposed action was shared, along with notification of the scoping process and related meetings and input opportunities. As part of the NOI, FHWA and ADOT invited all interested individuals, organizations, public agencies, and Native American Tribes to comment on the scope of the Tier 1 EIS, including the purpose and need, alternatives to be studied, impacts to be valuated, and evaluation methods to be used. The formal scoping period spanned 45 days from publication of the NOI through July 8, 2016.
Potential issues, opportunities, and concerns were solicited from various agencies, the community, and others to understand the scope of topics to address during the study. Scoping activities included a total of nine agency and public meetings across the I-11 Corridor study area, combined with an online survey and solicitation of comments via mail, email, and telephone for those unable to attend the meetings in person. The online survey requested the same information as the comment form distributed at the meetings. Comments were welcomed at any point in the process, but only those submitted through the end of the scoping period (July 8, 2016) were integrated into the Scoping Summary Report as formal documentation of community issues, opportunities, and concerns. A copy of the Scoping Summary Report is included on the Documents page.
Following scoping, a wide range of corridor alternatives were developed. For the purposes of the alternatives development and screening, the I-11 Corridor study area is divided into three sections – South, Central and North, with the ultimate goal to piece together a set of corridor-wide alternatives. The alternative corridor options were screened based on a series of criteria, including consistency with the Purpose and Need. The screening has enabled FHWA and ADOT to refine and further consider corridor alternatives that best meet the overall Purpose and Need of the I-11 Corridor, as well eliminate corridor options that do not adequately meet the Purpose and Need. Ultimately, the screening process will yield a reasonable range of corridor alternatives, along with a No Build alternative – or “do nothing” scenario – that will advance into the Tier 1 EIS document for more detailed study.
The evaluation process is outlined below.
An initial range of corridor options for each of the three study area sections is developed based on four primary sources:
To promote comprehensive coverage of the I-11 Corridor Study Area, the information and suggestions from these four sources will be used to identify reasonable potential corridor alternatives to be screened during the preparation of the ASR.
Alternative corridor options will be screened based on a series of criteria and specific measures to ensure they meet and achieve the underlying purpose of the I-11 Corridor and supporting needs. A qualitative (high/medium/low) approach is used to decide which corridor options are more effective at meeting the Corridor’s Purpose and Need. The alternatives will be compared against how well each option:
The best-performing options within each section (North, Central, and South) will be advanced into the Tier 1 EIS, where they will be subject to more detailed analysis. At this point, the corridor options will be pieced together to create a series of end-to-end alternatives that stretch from Nogales to Wickenburg. These alternatives are intended to represent the full series of ideas obtained during scoping. Public informational meetings are scheduled to review and comment on the alternatives evaluation process.
The final step in the alternatives analysis process will be to provide more detailed definition of the Corridor Build Alternatives and the No Build Alternative recommended for further analysis in the Tier 1 EIS phase. They will be described in sufficient detail to identify limits of the 2,000-foot corridor alternatives, as well as the potential right-of-way requirements to accommodate the typical cross section of a high capacity transportation facility from Nogales to Wickenburg. This information will be the basis for determining potential impacts on the human and natural environments during the Tier 1 EIS.
The Draft Tier 1 EIS is an official document issued during the NEPA process that documents the detailed analysis of the alternatives. The results of this analysis will identify a Recommended Corridor Alternative (expected to be 2,000’ wide), including a phased implementation plan, which thoughtfully divides the 280-mile corridor into smaller segments that may advance as separate, independent projects following completion of the Tier 1 EIS process.
In the Draft Tier 1 EIS, alternatives identified through the Alternatives Evaluation process, known as the Build Corridor Alternatives, will be compared against a No Build Alternative (i.e., do-nothing option). The Draft Tier 1 EIS will consider possible effects that alternatives might have on a variety of social, environmental, and economic resources, as well as understanding their direct, indirect, and cumulative effects on the surrounding environment. These resources may include:
The Draft Tier 1 EIS document will be circulated for public and agency comment over a 45-day review period, where the public and agencies will have an opportunity to review and comment. Public hearings will be held to present the information and encourage formal comments. Locations for viewing the document as well as public meeting dates will be announced and included under the Community Outreach and Public Meetings page. When the Draft Tier 1 EIS document is completed, it will be available on the Documents page.
Upon completion of the public hearing process, the project team will respond to comments received on the Draft Tier 1 EIS, conduct additional analysis, and coordinate with stakeholders, as needed, in preparation of finalizing the Tier 1 EIS.
FHWA and ADOT will complete the environmental review process with the preparation of a Final Tier 1 EIS. The Final Tier 1 EIS will respond to comments received on the Draft Tier 1 EIS and identify the Preferred Corridor Alternative for the I-11 Corridor between Nogales and Wickenburg. The Final Tier 1 EIS will be made available online on the Documents page.
The Final Tier 1 EIS will be made available for a designated public review period. The Final Tier 1 EIS will be made available online on the Documents page.
ADOT and FHWA will complete the environmental review process with preparation of a Record of Decision (ROD). The ROD will confirm the Selected Corridor Alternative (Build or No Build); present the basis for the decision; describe the alternatives considered; and provide strategies to avoid, minimize, and compensate for environmental impacts. FHWA would ultimately approve the ROD as the Federal Lead Agency under NEPA. The ROD will be made available online on the Documents page.
A continuous community outreach process has been integrated into every step of the project to provide residents, businesses, the traveling public and other interested parties with multiple opportunities for meaningful participation in the process. Public meeting information is identified on the Community Outreach and Public Meetings page.